Ensemble machine learning on gene expression data for cancer classification.
By Aik Choon Tan, David R. Gilbert. Applied Bioinformatics, 2003
433 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74b2828dfdf71f2462d88b90a9fc82b90a0f83ca
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Dinggang Shen
- Daoqiang Zhang
- Yaping Wang
- Luping Zhou
- Hong Yuan
- Ahad Nasab
- Austin H. Chen
- Nafiseh Ghaffar Nia
Citations in the corpus
- Multimodal Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment (2011, methodology): “This technique is also called ensemble learning, which has been a very popular learning method for decades in the machine learning community (Tan and Gilbert, 2003).”
- Evaluation of artificial intelligence techniques in disease diagnosis and prediction (2023, background): “In this work, ensemble ML (bagged and grown decision trees) outperformed single decision trees [107].”
- A New Multi-Task Learning Technique to Predict Classification of Leukemia and Prostate Cancer (2010, methodology): “There are several machine learning techniques such as k-nearest neighbours, clustering methods, self organizing maps (SOM) [6], back-propagation neural network [7, 8] , probabilistic neural network, decision tree [9], random forest [10], support vector machines (SVM) [11, 12], multicategory support ”
- A Review of Ensemble Methods in Bioinformatics (2010, unknown): “In comparison to the single tree classifier, Tan and Gilbert [34] demonstrated that, overall, ensemble methods of bagging and boosting are more robust and accurate in microarray data classification using seven publicly available datasets.”