Estimating the House Foreclosure Discount Corrected for Spatial Price Interdependence and Endogeneity of Marketing Time
By Terrence M. Clauretie, N. Daneshvary. 2009
150 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/749ef806f4c1051b2385f8dd6d8cbb03287cec64
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Kristopher Gerardi
- P. Willen
- Vincent Yao
- E. Rosenblatt
- Edward Kung
- Elliot Anenberg
- John Y. Campbell
- Hye-Sung Han
Citations in the corpus
- Estimates of the Size and Source of Price Declines Due to Nearby Foreclosures (2014, background): “These other papers are reviewed in Clauretie and Daneshvary [2009].”
- Foreclosure externalities: New evidence (2015, background): “Clauretie and Daneshvary (2009) also finds a foreclosure discount of slightly less than 10 percent in the Las Vegas metropolitan area between 2004 and 2007. In contrast, Harding, Rosenblatt, and Yao (2011) finds little evidence of a meaningful foreclosure discount, using both hedonic and repeat-sale”
- Estimating the effect of mortgage foreclosures on nearby property values: a critical review of the literature (2010, unknown): “Figure 2 illustrates temporal variation in house prices over the same 2000–9 period as measured by two popular indices—the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and S&P/Case-Shiller.”