TRADE OFFS IN HABITAT-SPECIFIC FORAGING EFFICIENCY AND THE NASCENT ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE OF STICKLEBACKS IN LAKES

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Habitat structure, feeding mode and morphological reversibility: factors influencing phenotypic plasticity in perch (2005, background): “© 2005 Jens Olsson to as a trophic polymorphism (reviewed in Robinson and Wilson, 1994; Skulason and Smith, 1995; Smith and Skulason, 1996; Bolnick et al., 2003).”
Fish behavioral types and their ecological consequences (2014, unknown): “Other fish species (e.g., threespine stickleback) show distinct resource polymorphisms in morphology, behavior, and resource use in some populations (McPhail 1993) but continuous variation in others (Robinson 2000).”
The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization (2002, background): “…aculeatus (three-spined stickleback) U/M G, E P M Feeding efficiency B/L, O Benthic and limnetic fish have different mean phenotypes and diet in single-species lakes Milinski 1987; Robinson 2000; Reimchen and Nosil 2001a; D. I. Bolnick, unpublished manuscript Haplochromis nyererei U na M ?”
Changing times, spaces, and faces: tests and implications of adaptive morphological plasticity in the fishes of northern postglacial lakes (2002, background): “Although the reciprocal test using the benthic species has not been performed, diet-induced phenotypes have been shown to have consequences to foraging performance even in less divergent phenotypes that coexist in a single variable stickleback population (Robinson 2000).”