FRAMES IN HILBERT C*-MODULES AND C*-ALGEBRAS

By M. Frank, D. Larson. 2000

278 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a general approach to a module frame theory in C*-algebras and Hilbert C*-modules. The investigations rely on the ideas of geometric dilation to standard Hilbert C*-modules over unital C*-algebras that possess orthonormal Hilbert bases, of reconstruction of the frames by projections and by other bounded module operators with suitable ranges. We obtain frame representation and decomposition the- orems, as well as similarity and equivalence results. Hilbert space frames and quasi- bases for conditional expectations of finite index on C*-algebras appear as special cases. Using a canonical categorical equivalence of Hilbert C*-modules over commutative C*- algebras and (F)Hilbert bundles the results find a reinterpretation for frames in vector and (F)Hilbert bundles. The purpose of this paper is to extend the theory of frames known for (separable) Hilbert spaces to similar sets in C*-algebras and (finitely and countably generated) Hilbert C*-modules. The concept 'frame' may generalize the concept 'Hilbert basis' for Hilbert C*-modules in a very efficient way circumventing the ambiguous condition of 'C*-linear independence' and emphasizing geometrical dilation results and operator properties. This idea is natural in this context because, while such a module may fail to have any reason- able type of basis, it turns out that countably generated Hilbert C*-modules over unital C*-algebras always have an abundance of frames of the strongest (and simplest) type. The considerations follow the line of the geometrical and operator-theoretical approach worked out by Deguang Han and David R. Larson (30) in the main. They include the standard Hilbert space case in full as a special case, see also (12, 13, 29, 31, 34, 57). However, proofs that generalize from the Hilbert space case, when attainable, are usually considerably more difficult for the module case for reasons that do not occur in the sim- pler Hilbert space case. For example, Riesz bases of Hilbert spaces with frame bounds equal to one are automatically orthonormal bases, a straight consequence of the frame definition. A similar statement for standard Riesz bases of certain Hilbert C*-modules still holds, but the proof of the statement requires incomparably more efforts to be estab- lished, see Corollary 4.2. Generally speaking, the known results and obstacles of Hilbert C*-module theory in comparison to Hilbert space and ideal theory would rather suggest to expect a number of counterexamples and diversifications of situations that could appear investigating classes of Hilbert C*-modules and of C*-algebras of coefficients beyond the Hilbert space situation. Surprisingly, almost the entire theory can be shown to survive these significant changes. For complementary results to those explained in the present paper we refer to (24, 28).

Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7481896dc7c29a3bfae8e53ca008e5adf97c2827

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Mathematics

  1. D. Larson
  2. V. Kaftal
  3. Shuang Zhang
  4. Deguang Han
  5. Franz Luef
  6. Christopher Heil
  7. Xin-Rong Dai
  8. M. Frank

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Deguang Han
  2. V. Kaftal
  3. Franz Luef
  4. Shuang Zhang
  5. D. Larson
  6. Xin-Rong Dai

Citations in the corpus