Sparse Convolved Gaussian Processes for Multi-output Regression
By Mauricio A Álvarez, Neil D. Lawrence. 2008
235 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Haitao Liu
- Paris Perdikaris
- Maizar Raissi
- G. Em Karniadakis
- Michalis K. Titsias
- Jianfei Cai
- Andrew Gordon Wilson
- Yoshua Bengio
Citations in the corpus
- Kernels for Vector-Valued Functions: a Review (2011, methodology): “In [2], the authors show how through making specific conditional independence assumptions, inspired by the model structure in the process convolution formulation (for which the LMC is a special case), it is possible to arrive at a series of efficient approximations that represent the covariance…”
- Gaussian Process Regression Networks (2011, background): “…an explosion of interest in extending the Gaussian process regression framework to account for fixed correlations between output variables (Alvarez and Lawrence, 2011; Yu et al., 2009; Alvarez and Lawrence, 2008; Bonilla et al., 2008; Osborne et al., 2008; Teh et al., 2005; Boyle and Frean, 2004).”
- Continual Multi-task Gaussian Processes (2019, methodology): “Given D output functions F and Q latent functions U , we build our joint prior to be p ( F , U ) = p ( F|U ) p ( U| ψ ) , where again, we use ψ to refer the subset of hyperparameters involved in the MOGP prior.”
- Latent Force Models (2009, methodology): “We are not the first to suggest the use of convolution processes for multi-output regression, they were proposed by (Higdon, 2002) and built on by (Boyle and Frean, 2005) — the ideas in these papers have also recently been made more computationally practical through sparse approximations suggested b”
- A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design (2017, methodology): “Some commonly used symmetric multi-response modeling approaches include, for example, the artificial neural networks (ANNs) that are extended to support multi-response by defining how inputs are shared across responses (Caruana 1995; Collobert and Weston 2008), the multi-response Gaussian process fr”
- Incremental Variational Sparse Gaussian Process Regression (2016, background): “� This general maximum likelihood scheme for finding the inducing points is adopted with variations in [23, 26, 8, 2].”
- Online Sparse Multi-Output Gaussian Process Regression and Learning (2019, background): “In [28] and [29], the sparse approximation [35] was integrated into the convolved multi-”
- Computationally Efficient Convolved Multiple Output Gaussian Processes (2011, methodology): “We show how through making specific conditional independence assumptions, inspired by the model structure (Álvarez and Lawrence, 2009), we arrive at a efficient approximation similar in form to the partially independent training conditional model (PITC, see Quiñonero-Candela and Rasmussen, 2005).”
- Efficient Multioutput Gaussian Processes through Variational Inducing Kernels (2010, methodology): “Before we propose our variational sparse inference method for multioutput GP regression in Section 4, we review the sparse method proposed by Álvarez and Lawrence (2009).”
- Inferring solutions of differential equations using noisy multi-fidelity data (2016, background): “An equally important direction involves solving systems of linear partial differential equations, which can be addressed using multi-output GP regression [26, 27].”
- Remarks on multi-output Gaussian process regression (2018, methodology): “Finally, to reduce the computational complexity of calculating K−1 M for cases with large-scale training data, some sparse approximations that use m (m N) inducing points to approximate the large covariance matrix, or use the variational inference to approximate the lower bound of p(y), have been ap”
- It is all in the noise: Efficient multi-task Gaussian process inference with structured residuals (2013, methodology): “In contrast to existing work extending Gaussian process multi task models by defining more complex covariance structures [2, 9, 8], our model utilizes the gradient of the marginal likelihood for parameter estimation and does not require expected maximization, variational approximation or MCMC…”
- Spike and Slab Variational Inference for Multi-Task and Multiple Kernel Learning (2011, methodology): “methods [11, 12, 13] and multi-task Gaussian processes (GPs) [14, 15, 16, 17].”