The mid-domain effect cannot explain the diversity gradient of Nearctic birds
By B. Hawkins, J. Diniz-Filho. 2002
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7466deab2eb63ebab616dccef18a742424a53dc5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Nicholas Gotelli
- Robert K. Colwell
- M. Kessler
- Brian J. McGill
- C. Rahbek
- J. Nekola
- K. Bach
- H. T. Arita
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Nicholas Gotelli
- Robert K. Colwell
- M. Kessler
- C. Rahbek
- Sebastián K. Herzog
- K. Bach
- Brian J. McGill
- C. McCain
Citations in the corpus
- Mechanisms in macroecology: AWOL or purloined letter? Towards a pragmatic view of mechanism (2010, background): “Similarly, several authors (Hawkins and Diniz-Filho 2002, Connolly et al. 2003, Kerr et al. 2006) have shown that random placement alone is not enough to fully explain variations in diversity across landscapes.”
- The elevational gradient in Andean bird species richness at the local scale: a foothill peak and a high‐elevation plateau (2005, background): “Raaijmakers 1987, Keating and Quinn 1998). For species-rich neotropical bird data sets, MMMean was the least biased of nine estimators evaluated by Herzog et al. (2002), but a drawback of MMMean is that no statistically sensible variance estimator exists (Colwell and Coddington 1994, Colwell pers.”
- The Mid‐Domain Effect: There’s a Baby in the Bathwater (2005, methodology): “In a recent article (Colwell et al. 2004; hereafter CRG), we reviewed all studies of the mid-domain effect (MDE) published up to that time and responded to earlier critiques of MDE by (among others) Hawkins and Diniz-Filho (2002) and Zapata et al. (2003).”
- Distribution pattern of trees along an elevation gradient of Eastern Himalaya, India (2011, unknown): “MDE received none or limited support from many other studies on various plant groups (Carpenter, 2005; Grau et al., 2007) as well as faunal communities (Hawkins and Diniz-Filho, 2002; Rangel and DinizFilho, 2003; Zapata et al., 2003; Li et al., 2009; Rowe, 2009).”
- Beta diversity and latitude in North American mammals: testing the hypothesis of covariation (2004, background): “However, current models cannot explain satisfactorily the observed spatial patterns for some continents (Bokma et al. 2001, Hawkins and Diniz-Filho 2002) and some of the more basic features of those patterns are still insufficiently explored (Zapata et al. 2003).”