Communication externalities in cities

By Sylvie Charlot, Gilles Duranton. 2003

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7465494a727b86828f5e5a1e53f28721b121631d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

How Close Is Close? The Spatial Reach of Agglomeration Economies (2020, background): “While it is true that information technology allows for effective communication with distant partners, these distant interactions are complementary to in-person interactions facilitated by close proximity (Charlot and Duranton, 2004 and 2006).”
The territorial dynamics of innovation in China and India (2012, unknown): “…economic geography approach, the geographical concentration of economic activity has an independent impact on innovation (Duranton and Puga, 2003; Charlot and Duranton, 2004) and thus needs to be controlled for in order to single out the impact of other ‘knowledge’ assets such us R&D intensity…”
Skills in the city (2009, background): “See Fujita and Thisse (2002) and Duranton and Puga (2004) for surveys of the theoretical literature.”
Why do you care what other people think? A qualitative investigation of social influence and telecommuting (2011, background): “In this regards, it is interesting to note that Charlot and Duranton [24] have found linkages between workplace communications and productivity and wage increases.”
Smart Cafe Cities: Testing human capital externalities in the Boston metropolitan area (2007, background): “Charlot and Duranton [ 7 ] identi…ed that workplace com-”
Production and consumption externalities of human capital: an empirical study for Italy (2007, background): “9 As explained in Chariot and Duranton (2004), the literature on human capital externalities has generally ignored the effect of city size, which is the focus of the related literature on urbanization economies (see Glaeser and Mare 2001).”
A Network-based view of regional growth (2014, background): “Similarly, research on agglomeration economies has indentified ‘communication externalities’ as an important factor that sits alongside externalities pertaining from human capital (Charlot and Duranton, 2004; 2006).”
Econometric modelling of the regional knowledge production function in Europe (2015, background): “On the one hand, face-to-face contacts make it possible for innovative actors to exchange highly valuable noncodified (or not-yet-codifiable) knowledge (Leamer and Storper, 2001; Charlot and Duranton, 2004; Storper and Venables, 2004).”
California Dreamin’: The Feeble Case for Cluster Policies (2011, background): “Using workplace communication data at the level of individual workers, Charlot and Duranton (2004) find that up to 20% of the benefits from clustering percolate through workplace communication.”
The urban wage growth premium: sorting or learning? (2014, background): “We might expect the urban wage premium and the wage growth premium to be greater for industries where knowledge spillovers are important (Audretsch and Feldman, 1996; Charlot and Duranton, 2004; Duranton and Puga, 2001, Henderson, 2003, Marshall, 1920).”
Growing through Cities in Developing Countries (2014, unknown): “Charlot and Duranton (2004) show that workplace communication, particularly communication with other workers outside the firm, is greater in larger cities and brings higher wages, consistent with standard spillover arguments. Also consistent with spillover arguments, Jaffe, Trajtenberg, and Henderso”