Biomarker and carbon isotopic constraints on bacterial and algal community structure and functioning in a turbid, tidal estuary

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does terrestrial organic carbon subsidize the planktonic food web in a clear‐water lake? (2007, methodology): “There were some differences in the 13C labeling among the algal groups (data not shown), suggesting that isotopic fractionation was not identical in these diverse taxa, a result consistent with other studies (Boschker et al. 2005).”
Comparison of methods to determine algal δ13C in freshwater (2008, background): “Nonetheless, the carbon signatures of specific compounds are often variable for a given algal group (Pel et al. 2003, Finlay 2004, Boschker et al. 2005, Bontes et al. 2006), and the results are currently limited because of low data availability and poor knowledge of processes influencing the δ13C…”
Stable carbon isotopic composition of Mytilus edulis shells: relation to metabolism, salinity, δ13CDIC and phytoplankton (2006, background): “…it is well established that the carbon isotope fractionation between phytoplankton and DIC is variable (Rau et al., 1992; Hinga et al., 1994; Boschker et al., 2005), a value between 18& and 22& is often used as an estimate (Cai et al., 1988; Hellings et al., 1999; Fry, 2002; Bouillon et…”
Autochthonous and allochthonous contributions to mesozooplankton diet in a tidal river and estuary: Integrating carbon isotope and fatty acid constraints (2009, background): “1998) and high rates of respiration and bacterial secondary production (Boschker et al. 2005).”