HABITAT SELECTION AT LOW POPULATION DENSITIES

By C. Greene, J. Stamps. 2001

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/746166fe6eb9ed24da652ab218850a8ac2e6884b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Density‐dependent habitat selection and the ideal free distribution in marine fish spatial dynamics: considerations and cautions (2004, unknown): “Other factors can inﬂuence how suitability changes with density such as Allee effects (Greene and Stamps 2001), interference competition (Kennedy and Gray 1993), conspeciﬁc attraction (Muller et al. 1997), genetic relatedness (Morris et al. 2001), aggregation level (Sutherland 1983), phenotype…”
Dynamic occupancy models reveal within-breeding season movement up a habitat quality gradient by a migratory songbird (2008, background): “Habitat selection is critical to both individual fitness (reviewed in Rodenhouse et al. 1997, Greene and Stamps 2001 ) and population dynamics (Pulliam and Danielson 1991, McPeek et al. 2001).”
MEASURING LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: THE CHALLENGE OF BEHAVIORAL LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY (2005, background): “…of the organisms (sensu Lima and Zollner 1996), their susceptibility to competition and predation, as well as their level of conspecific attraction, will play an important role at determining the movements of individuals (Danielson 1992, Bélisle 1998, Fraser et al. 2001, Greene and Stamps 2001).”
AVIAN HABITAT MANAGEMENT MEETS CONSPECIFIC ATTRACTION: IF YOU BUILD IT, WILL THEY COME? (2006, background): “Models have suggested that following such cues may reduce search costs, se lement costs, or the costs of the “Allee eff ect” (Greene and Stamps 2001).”
The Developmental, Physiological, Neural, and Genetical Causes and Consequences of Frequency-Dependent Selection in the Wild (2006, background): “…interactions that arise from FDS and generate never-ending cycles of adaptation and counter adaptation FDS. Positive FDS can be due to Allee effects (Greene & Stamps 2001) in which rarity limits and high density permits interaction, or from aposematic effects where aggregations enhance…”
From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use (2007, unknown): “First, doing so can reduce search costs (Kiester 1979; Stamps 1988, Greene and Stamps 2001).”