Multiqubit systems: highly entangled states and entanglement distribution
By A. Borras, A. Plastino, J. Batle, C. Zander, M. Casas, A. Plastino. 2007
157 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A comparison is made of various searching procedures, based upon different entanglement measures or entanglement indicators, for highly entangled multiqubits states. In particular, our present results are compared with those recently reported by Brown et al (J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 2005 38 1119). The statistical distribution of entanglement values for the aforementioned multiqubit systems is also explored.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7430bf8d51ca7898d3ad37ac3b069620832de0e6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Citations in the corpus
- Genuinely multipartite entangled states and orthogonal arrays (2014, background): “It is worth to emphasize that there exist no 2–uniform states of four qubits [8, 12, 13, 18, 25].”
- Absolutely maximally entangled states, combinatorial designs, and multiunitary matrices (2015, unknown): “For the sake of completeness, let us also provide an AME six-qubit state, The case of seven qubits remains unsolved but numerical evidence hints at the impossibility of finding such an AME state [36].”
- Geometry of Quantum States: Index (2007, methodology): “Maximizing Qk over the set of all states is a difficult optimisation problem, becoming computationally more expensive if we use the von Neumann entropy [148, 306].”