A brief note on some possible factors involved in the reactions of horses to humans
By M. Hausberger, Christine Müller. 2002
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Equine, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74259c76584df284dcfe1e67d6c7d922e4f31a6d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Equine
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Assessment of equine temperament by a questionnaire survey to caretakers and evaluation of its reliability by simultaneous behavior test (2003, background): “One possible reason is that the subject horses consisted of various breeds (Mader and Price, 1980; Hausberger and Muller, 2002), ages (Mader and Price, 1980), stages of training (Visser et al.”
- Differences in motor laterality between breeds of performance horse (2006, background): “Breed differences in behaviour are widely reported (Mader and Price, 1980; Bagshaw et al., 1994; Clarke et al., 1996; Sappington et al., 1997; Hausberger et al., 1998; Houpt and Kusunose, 2000; Hausberger and Muller, 2002) and selection for heightened flight responses in racing breeds is more preval”
- A review of the human-horse relationship (2008, background): “, 2005), scores of reactivity with a predefined scale (McCann et al., 1988a, b; Houpt and Kusunose, 2000; Hausberger and Muller, 2002; Pritchett et al., 2003) or frequencies of target behaviours such as number of interactions with the experimenter (e.”
- Horse personality: Variation between breeds (2008, background): “The results of this study have provided further evidence for breed typical personalities and is supported by findings of other studies (Hausberger and Muller, 2002; Hausberger et al., 2004).”