Precision measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant using cold atoms

By G. Rosi, F. Sorrentino, L. Cacciapuoti, M. Prevedelli, G. Tino. Nature, 2014

674 citations recorded by the source corpus.

About 300 experiments have tried to determine the value of the Newtonian gravitational constant, G, so far, but large discrepancies in the results have made it impossible to know its value precisely. The weakness of the gravitational interaction and the impossibility of shielding the effects of gravity make it very difficult to measure G while keeping systematic effects under control. Most previous experiments performed were based on the torsion pendulum or torsion balance scheme as in the experiment by Cavendish in 1798, and in all cases macroscopic masses were used. Here we report the precise determination of G using laser-cooled atoms and quantum interferometry. We obtain the value G = 6.67191(99) × 10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2 with a relative uncertainty of 150 parts per million (the combined standard uncertainty is given in parentheses). Our value differs by 1.5 combined standard deviations from the current recommended value of the Committee on Data for Science and Technology. A conceptually different experiment such as ours helps to identify the systematic errors that have proved elusive in previous experiments, thus improving the confidence in the value of G. There is no definitive relationship between G and the other fundamental constants, and there is no theoretical prediction for its value, against which to test experimental results. Improving the precision with which we know G has not only a pure metrological interest, but is also important because of the key role that G has in theories of gravitation, cosmology, particle physics and astrophysics and in geophysical models.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74228ab843b2b628652eda2ffc480f279500bc17

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. D. DeMille
  2. C. Clark
  3. Andrei Derevianko
  4. Marianna S. Safronova
  5. Dmitry Budker
  6. D. F. Kimball

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Andrei Derevianko

Citations in the corpus