Nameless + harmless = blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior

By Francesca Gino, Lisa L. Shu, Max H. Bazerman. 2010

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/741f9e8abcdab7bafc5f8120647eb815033e51f8

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding ordinary unethical behavior: why people who value morality act immorally (2015, unknown): “far more likely to condemn someone’s unethical behavior when it leads to a bad rather than a good outcome [38,39].”
• Behavioral Ethics: Toward a Deeper Understanding of Moral Judgment and Dishonesty (2012, unknown): “Consistent with our own research on the topic (see Gino et al., 2010; Gino et al., 2012), when allocating punishment, the other party paid more attention to the equality of the result of the rolled die—a random outcome—than to the chooser’s sense of fairness (as demonstrated by which option she…”