Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids.

By Julian R. Jones. Acta Biomaterialia, 2013

2,279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (2017, background): “similar to trabecular bone, providing cells with a temporary template to regenerate into [153].”
Sol-gel based materials for biomedical applications (2016, background): “However, the controlling the rate of degradation is complex, excessive degradation rates must be avoided because the materials have to maintain space during the healing process with appropriate mechanical properties and Bioglass can degrade at an excessively fast rate which can detrimental affect ce”
Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review (2017, background): “It seems the fast degradation of bioglass may lead to a higher pH value and accumulated ions in the microenvironment, which is not favored by cells, and thus jeopardized the bone ingrowth [156].”
Multifunctional Coatings to Simultaneously Promote Osseointegration and Prevent Infection of Orthopaedic Implants (2016, positive): “However, when combined with additional components, bioactive glasses can both promote osteogenesis and provide significant antimicrobial activity [49].”