Evaluating Gender Bias in Natural Language Inference
By Shanya Sharma Sharma, Manan Dey, Koustuv Sinha. 2021
46 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Gender-bias stereotypes have recently raised significant ethical concerns in natural language processing. However, progress in detection and evaluation of gender bias in natural language understanding through inference is limited and requires further investigation. In this work, we propose an evaluation methodology to measure these biases by constructing a challenge task that involves pairing gender-neutral premises against a gender-specific hypothesis. We use our challenge task to investigate state-of-the-art NLI models on the presence of gender stereotypes using occupations. Our findings suggest that three models (BERT, RoBERTa, BART) trained on MNLI and SNLI datasets are significantly prone to gender-induced prediction errors. We also find that debiasing techniques such as augmenting the training dataset to ensure a gender-balanced dataset can help reduce such bias in certain cases.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Samuel R. Bowman
- Mohit Bansal
- Percy Liang
- Jianfeng Gao
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Yejin Choi
- Hannaneh Hajishirzi
- Noah A. Smith
In Natural Language Processing
- Samuel R. Bowman
- Mohit Bansal
- Jason Phang
- Jianfeng Gao
- Nikita Nangia
- Yejin Choi
- Percy Liang
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability
- Oskar van der Wal
- Alexandra Sasha Luccioni
- Stella Biderman
- Nikita Nangia
- Angelica Chen
- Shanya Sharma Sharma
- Manan Dey
- Miruna Clinciu
Citations in the corpus
- BBQ: A hand-built bias benchmark for question answering (2021, background): “LMs have been found to reproduce social biases in downstream tasks, such as textual entailment (Dev et al., 2020; Sharma et al., 2021), language generation (Sheng et al., 2019), and coreference resolution (Rudinger et al., 2018).”
- Memory-assisted prompt editing to improve GPT-3 after deployment (2022, background): “Finally, large-language models generate text that might be biased and insensitive to a user’s socio-cultural context (Bordia and Bowman, 2019; Sharma et al., 2021; Hovy and Prabhumoye, 2021).”
- You reap what you sow: On the Challenges of Bias Evaluation Under Multilingual Settings (2022, methodology): “The majority of previous work on bias has focused par-694 ticularly on gender bias (Zhao et al., 2018; Stanovsky 695 et al., 2019; Levy et al., 2021; Sharma et al., 2021) and the very few works (Nadeem et al., 2020; Nangia et al., 2020) that take other dimensions of biases into account, have their…”
- Theories of “Gender” in NLP Bias Research (2022, background): “[132] Shanya Sharma, Manan Dey, and Koustuv Sinha.”