Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post…
By J. Schulz-Menger, David A. Bluemke, J. Bremerich, S. Flamm, M. Fogel, M. Friedrich, R. Kim, F. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, C. Kramer, D. Pennell and 2 more. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2013
1,171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
With mounting data on its accuracy and prognostic value, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is becoming an increasingly important diagnostic tool with growing utility in clinical routine. Given its versatility and wide range of quantitative parameters, however, agreement on specific standards for the interpretation and post-processing of CMR studies is required to ensure consistent quality and reproducibility of CMR reports. This document addresses this need by providing consensus recommendations developed by the Task Force for Post Processing of the Society for Cardiovascular MR (SCMR). The aim of the task force is to recommend requirements and standards for image interpretation and post processing enabling qualitative and quantitative evaluation of CMR images. Furthermore, pitfalls of CMR image analysis are discussed where appropriate.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73e8001c679b08c29bf6539b40f81a49e7b59bf2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Alejandro F Frangi
- Xavier Pennec
- Daniel Rueckert
- Pierre Ablin
- David A. Bluemke
- Sotirios A. Tsaftaris
- Wenjia Bai
- Arvid Lundervold
Citations in the corpus
- A bi-ventricular cardiac atlas built from 1000+ high resolution MR images of healthy subjects and an analysis of shape and motion (2015, neutral): “…the left ventricular cavity, the myocardium and the right ventricular cavity were manually segmented in 20 subjects at the ED and ES phase using the software itkSNAP (Yushkevich et al., 2006) by experienced clinicians in accordance with the SCMR recommendations (Schulz-Menger et al., 2013).”
- Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. (2017, methodology): “It can be helpful to use analysis software that allows adjustment for systolic atrioventricular ring descent using cross-referencing from long-axis locations.(6) The RV contouring is performed in an analogous manner, with the RVOT volume included in the RV end-diastolic volume.”
- Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children (2015, methodology): “Right ventricular dimensions and functions in the adult CMR acquisition parameters For measurement of right ventricular volumes a stack of cine SSFP images acquired either horizontally or in short axis view can be used [7].”
- Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (2020, neutral): “BMI, median (IQR)b 25 (23-28) 23 (20-25)c 27 (23-29) <.”
- Statistical shape modeling of the left ventricle: myocardial infarct classification challenge (2017, background): “LV cavity volumes, particularly EDV and ESV, LV mass and EF [15].”