SEQUENTIAL CHANGE DETECTION REVISITED
By George V. Moustakides. 2008
63 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In sequential change detection, existing performance measures differ significantly in the way they treat the time of change. By modeling this quantity as a random time, we introduce a general framework capable of capturing and better understanding most well-known criteria and also propose new ones. For a specific new criterion that constitutes an extension to Lorden's performance measure, we offer the optimum structure for detecting a change in the constant drift of a Brownian motion and a formula for the corresponding optimum performance.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73de827ecbaeec207f417871de1be8b626fb6503
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Aleksey S. Polunchenko
- Alexander G. Tartakovsky
- Taposh Banerjee
- Venugopal V. Veeravalli
- George V. Moustakides
- Yajun Mei
- Kwok Leung Tsui
- Sung Won Han
Citations in the corpus
- Data-efficient minimax quickest change detection (2012, background): “This result was improved upon by Moustakides [7] who showed that the CuSum algorithm is exactly optimal under Lorden’s criterion.”
- Numerical Comparison of CUSUM and Shiryaev–Roberts Procedures for Detecting Changes in Distributions (2009, methodology): “two different mathematical setups. In the first we follow the minimax approach proposed by Lorden (1971) and expressed through (1.1). A similar measure, seemingly less pessimistic (for a discussion see Moustakides, 2008), was proposed in Pollak (1985) where detection speed is expressed via the supremu”