A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
By Sjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Charles Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij. 2017
76 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Longo Luca
- Giulia Vilone
- Vaishak Belle
- Ioannis Papantonis
- Timo Speith
- Xinyi Zhou
- Hector J. Levesque
- Christian Walter Peter Omlin
Citations in the corpus
- Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learning (2020, background): “Relevant works include [80], where the authors propose a way to construct explanatory arguments from Bayesian models, as well as [52], where explanations are produced in order to assess the trustworthiness of a model.”
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Review (2020, methodology): “Probabilistically Supported Arguments (PSA) [307] is a two-phase method for extracting probabilistically explanatory supported arguments from a bayesian network.”