A Modern History of Fiscal Prudence and Profligacy

By Paolo Mauro, Rafael Romeu, Ariel J. Binder, A. Zaman. Social Science Research Network, 2013

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We draw on a newly collected historical dataset of fiscal variables for a large panel of countries — to our knowledge, the most comprehensive database currently available — to gauge the degree of fiscal prudence or profligacy for each country over the past several decades. Specifically, our dataset consists of fiscal revenues, primary expenditures, the interest bill (and thus both the primary and the overall fiscal deficit), the government debt, and gross domestic product, for 55 countries for up to two hundred years. For the first time, a large cross country historical data set covers both fiscal stocks and flows. Using Bohn’s (1998) approach and other tests for fiscal sustainability, we document how the degree of prudence or profligacy varies significantly over time within individual countries. We find that such variation is driven in part by unexpected changes in potential economic growth and sovereign borrowing costs.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73d05cc25a9be4e7299ae479d9fba88d27231458

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Populist Leaders and the Economy (2020, background): “More generally, is there a typical “populist playbook” that these types of leaders follow?”