Personal Opinion Surveys

By Barbara A. Kitchenham, Shari Lawrence Pfleeger. Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, 2008

526 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73c84100b7e68e8ee87736614cf53aa7de9bc9b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. Thomas Zimmermann
2. Paul Ralph
3. Christian Bird
4. Alberto Bacchelli
5. Sebastian Baltes
6. Raymond P. L. Buse

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Thomas Zimmermann
2. Paul Ralph
3. Christian Bird
4. Alberto Bacchelli
5. Sebastian Baltes
6. Raymond P. L. Buse

Citations in the corpus

• Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review (2013, methodology): “For the design of the surveys, we followed Kitchenham and Pfleeger’s guidelines for personal opinion surveys [20].”
• Information needs for software development analytics (2012, methodology): “Again following the advice by Kitchenham and Pfleeger [27], we report the percentage of the response “Very Important” (for importance) and “Very Difficult” (for difficult) among all responses (excluding no opinion) in Figure 2.”
• Smart Contract Development: Challenges and Opportunities (2021, unknown): “Besides, following the advice in [78], i.”
• Sampling in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines (2020, methodology): “, 2016) or questionnaire surveys (Kitchenham and Pfleeger, 2002; De Mello and Travassos, 2016) while others provide more general primers similar to that in Section 2 (e.g. de Mello et al., 2015; Kitchenham and Pfleeger, 2008).”