Theorizing Migration Policy: Is There a Third Way? 1

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Effectiveness of Immigration Policies (2013, background): “With the exception of the preferential access many states give to descendants of “ethnic” nationals (such as German Aussiedler or Japanese Nikkeijin in Latin America), policies selecting migrants according to class background (such as through point systems) can be an indirect and covert measure to i”
International Migration: Trends, Determinants, and Policy Effects (2019, background): “Migration policies are typically a compromise among competing interests, which explains why their stated and real objectives are generally multiple and sometimes inherently contradictory (Bonjour 2011; Boswell 2007; Boswell and Geddes 2011; Czaika and de Haas 2013; Freeman 1995; Hollifield 1992).”
Growing Restrictiveness or Changing Selection? The Nature and Evolution of Migration Policies1 (2014, unknown): “…agents (Infantino 2010; Paoletti 2010) and the debate about the “securitization” of migration (the linking of migration to national security issues, including terrorism; cf. Ibrahim 2005; Boswell 2007a) tend to reinforce the belief that migration policies have generally become more restrictive.”