Inertial Focusing for Tumor Antigen–Dependent and –Independent Sorting of Rare Circulating Tumor Cells
By E. Ozkumur, Ajay M Shah, Jordan C. Ciciliano, B. Emmink, D. Miyamoto, E. Brachtel, Min Yu, Pin-i Chen, B. Morgan, Julie Trautwein and 20 more. Science Translational Medicine, 2013
1,059 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A multistage microfluidic chip is capable of sorting rare EpCAM+ and EpCAM− CTCs from cancer patients’ whole blood. Positive and Negative Outcomes Usually people want the good news first, to help cope with the bad news that inevitably follows. However, patients will soon desire both the positive and the negative outcomes together, according to the latest study by Ozkumur and colleagues. These authors have developed a multistage microfluidic device that is capable of sorting rare circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that are either positive or negative for the surface antigen epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM). EpCAM+ cells found in the bloodstream have long defined the typical CTC. Many sorting technologies have been developed to enumerate EpCAM+ CTCs in cancer patient’s blood; however, these cells are not always detectable in cancers with low EpCAM expression, like triple-negative breast cancer or melanoma. Ozkumur et al. engineered an automated platform, called the “CTC-iChip,” that captured both EpCAM+ and EpCAM− cancer cells in clinical samples using a series of debulking, inertial focusing, and magnetic separation steps. The sorted CTCs could then be interrogated using standard clinical protocols, such as immunocytochemistry. The authors tested the “positive mode” of their device using whole blood from patients with prostate, lung, breast, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers. After successfully separating out the EpCAM+ CTCs, they confirmed that the cells were viable and had high-quality RNA for molecular analysis, in one example, detecting the EML4-ALK gene fusion in lung cancer. Using the “negative mode” of their device, the authors were able to capture EpCAM− CTCs from patients with metastatic breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and melanoma. The isolated CTCs showed similar morphology when compared with primary tumor tissue from these patients, suggesting that the microfluidic device can be used for clinical diagnoses—delivering both positive and negative news at once. Ozkumur et al. also demonstrated that CTCs isolated using the iChip could be analyzed on the single-cell level. One such demonstration with 15 CTCs from a prostate cancer patient reveals marked heterogeneity in the expression of mesenchymal and stem cell markers as well as typical prostate cancer–related antigens. The CTC-iChip can therefore process large volumes of patient blood to obtain not just EpCAM+ CTCs but also the EpCAM− ones, thus giving a broader picture of an individual’s cancer status and also allowing the device to be used for more cancer types. With the ability to further analyze the molecular characteristics of CTCs, this CTC-iChip could be a promising addition to current diagnostic tools used in the clinic. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are shed into the bloodstream from primary and metastatic tumor deposits. Their isolation and analysis hold great promise for the early detection of invasive cancer and the management of advanced disease, but technological hurdles have limited their broad clinical utility. We describe an inertial focusing–enhanced microfluidic CTC capture platform, termed “CTC-iChip,” that is capable of sorting rare CTCs from whole blood at 107 cells/s. Most importantly, the iChip is capable of isolating CTCs using strategies that are either dependent or independent of tumor membrane epitopes, and thus applicable to virtually all cancers. We specifically demonstrate the use of the iChip in an expanded set of both epithelial and nonepithelial cancers including lung, prostate, pancreas, breast, and melanoma. The sorting of CTCs as unfixed cells in solution allows for the application of high-quality clinically standardized morphological and immunohistochemical analyses, as well as RNA-based single-cell molecular characterization. The combination of an unbiased, broadly applicable, high-throughput, and automatable rare cell sorting technology with generally accepted molecular assays and cytology standards will enable the integration of CTC-based diagnostics into the clinical management of cancer.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cancer Research, Oncology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73adc20ee5712601ab5bebbfe08f06a6ec7d62fd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Cancer Research
- Jörg Vogel
- A. Westermann
- S. Gorski
- Antoine-Emmanuel Saliba
- W. El-Deiry
- Christina Kendziorski
- Rhonda L. Bacher
- Jingyi Jessica Li
In Oncology
Citations in the corpus
- Circulating Tumor Cell Clusters are Oligoclonal Precursors of Breast Cancer Metastasis (2014, methodology): “The development of advancedmicrofluidic CTC isolation technology (Ozkumur et al., 2013) enabled us to undertake such a detailed study of human breast cancer cells as they transiently circulate in the bloodstream of patients with metastatic disease.”
- Acoustic separation of circulating tumor cells (2015, methodology): “For instance, continuous-flow RBC removal methods predicated upon deterministic later displacement could be integrated with the taSSAW-based separation device to enable processing of whole blood (18).”
- Small but Perfectly Formed? Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities for Microfluidics in the Chemical and Biological Sciences (2017, methodology): “Indeed, the very best of these systems utilize both methodologies to increase purity and throughput.(36)”
- RNA-Seq of Single Prostate CTCs Implicates Noncanonical Wnt Signaling in Antiandrogen Resistance (2015, positive): “We applied the CTC-iChip to magnetically deplete normal hematopoietic cells from whole blood specimens (10).”
- Single-cell RNA-seq: advances and future challenges (2014, positive): “CTCs have been isolated from patients using epithelial cell surface markers and microfluidics-based technologies; these technologies have also enabled manipulation of single CTCs (75,76) that in principle could be analyzed via single-cell sequencing (Figure 1C).”