Validated age and growth of the dusky shark, Carcharhinus obscurus, from Western Australian waters
By C. Simpfendorfer, R. McAuley, J. Chidlow, P. Unsworth. 2002
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7388883c0c505b2a6bb5b19da7d013f8462e5b5f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aquatic Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Reassessing the value of nursery areas to shark conservation and management (2009, background): “Estimates place the age at maturity for C. obscurus around 17–22 years for females (220–250 cm), and 20–23 years for males (230–243 cm) (Simpfendorfer et al. 2002).”
- A method for evaluating the impacts of fishing mortality and stochastic influences on the demography of two long-lived shark stocks (2007, methodology): “…method, because the latter resulted in inconsistently high estimates of Mwt. Live weight-at-age was estimated from each species’ mean length-at-age (Simpfendorfer et al., 2002; McAuley et al., 2006) and the female relationships between length and live weight given by McAuley and Simpfendorfer…”
- Age under-estimation in New Zealand porbeagle sharks (Lamna nasus): is there an upper limit to ages that can be determined from shark vertebrae? (2007, methodology): “The fitted curve had a form analogous to a von Bertalanffy curve forced through the length at birth (Simpfendorfer et al. 2002): A = A0 + (A∞ − A0)(1 − e−k(A′−A′0)) (2) where A is the age estimate from Reader 2, A0 is the origin on the age-estimate axis (= 20 years), A′ and A′0 (= 20 years) are the…”