Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Multifunctional agriculture in policy and practice? A comparative analysis of Norway and Australia (2008, background): “Tilzey’s findings resonate with those of van der Ploeg and Roep (2003) who found that multifunctionality holds a strong paradigmatic position at both an EU policy level and at the practical level (farmers involved in rural development practices)—however with varying endorsement at the national…”
Multifunctionality of Agriculture:A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments (2007, background): “The above framework broadens the traditional view on farming and incorporates the vision on rural systems of e.g. van der Ploeg and Roep (2003) or Belletti et al. (2003), who advocate the broadening of traditional agricultural production through diversification, deepening and regrounding.”
Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the intention of small farmers in diversifying their agricultural production (2017, background): “Sometimes this concept includes activities developed inside the farm and sometimes outside the farm (Abdulai and Crolerees, 2001; Barbieri and Mahoney, 2009; Barbieri and Mshenga, 2008; Ellis, 2000; Ilbery, 1991; Meraner et al., 2015; Ploeg and Roep, 2003).”