A Bilinear Source-Scaling Model for M-log A Observations of Continental Earthquakes

By T. Hanks, W. Bakun. 2002

282 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Pseudo-Dynamic Approximation to Dynamic Rupture Models for Strong Ground Motion Prediction (2004, background): “The possibility that the scaling coefficients for fracture energy Gc are different for earthquakes below and above M 6.5 has interesting implications, as this is the magnitude range where standard scaling relations may break down (Shimazaki, 1986; Hanks and Bakun, 2003 ).”
Recipe for Predicting Strong Ground Motion from Crustal Earthquake Scenarios (2011, unknown): “Such a twostage scaling relationship was also found by HANKS and BAKUN (2002).”
Earthquake scaling relations for mid‐ocean ridge transform faults (2004, background): “…with large aspect ratios, whether slip scales with rupture width [Romanowicz, 1992, 1994; Romanowicz and Ruff, 2002], length [Scholz, 1994a, 1994b; Hanks and Bakun, 2002], or something in between [Mai and Beroza, 2000; P. Somerville, personal communication, 2003]; (3) the outer scale of faulting,…”
Earthquake Surface Slip-Length Data is Fit by Constant Stress Drop and is Useful for Seismic Hazard Analysis (2013, methodology): “Data source for magnitude-area data from Hanks and Bakun (2002, 2008) is reproduced in Ⓔ Table S2.”
A Summary of Previous Working Groups on California Earthquake Probabilities (2007, background): “03 + (4/3)log10(A) if A > 1000 km(2) (WGCEP-2002 eq. 4.6a; Hanks and Bakun, 2002) 5) M = 3.”