OBSCURATION-DEPENDENT EVOLUTION OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI

By J. Buchner, A. Georgakakis, K. Nandra, M. Brightman, M. Menzel, Zhu Liu, L. Hsu, Mara Salvato, C. Rangel, J. Aird and 2 more. 2015

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We aim to constrain the evolution of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) as a function of obscuration using an X-ray-selected sample of ∼2000 AGNs from a multi-tiered survey including the CDFS, AEGIS-XD, COSMOS, and XMM-XXL fields. The spectra of individual X-ray sources are analyzed using a Bayesian methodology with a physically realistic model to infer the posterior distribution of the hydrogen column density and intrinsic X-ray luminosity. We develop a novel non-parametric method that allows us to robustly infer the distribution of the AGN population in X-ray luminosity, redshift, and obscuring column density, relying only on minimal smoothness assumptions. Our analysis properly incorporates uncertainties from low count spectra, photometric redshift measurements, association incompleteness, and the limited sample size. We find that obscured AGNs with NH > 1022 cm−2 account for of the number density and luminosity density of the accretion supermassive black hole population with LX > 1043 erg s−1, averaged over cosmic time. Compton-thick AGNs account for approximately half the number and luminosity density of the obscured population, and of the total. We also find evidence that the evolution is obscuration dependent, with the strongest evolution around NH  ≈  1023 cm−2. We highlight this by measuring the obscured fraction in Compton-thin AGNs, which increases toward z  ∼  3, where it is 25% higher than the local value. In contrast, the fraction of Compton-thick AGNs is consistent with being constant at ≈35%, independent of redshift and accretion luminosity. We discuss our findings in the context of existing models and conclude that the observed evolution is, to first order, a side effect of anti-hierarchical growth.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/735afbe9a0e1436b43e7fae9ab230d87ceff4b31

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. Volker Springel
  4. D. M. Alexander
  5. M. Vogelsberger
  6. P. Torrey
  7. Shy Genel
  8. D. Nelson

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. D. M. Alexander
  4. Volker Springel
  5. C. Faucher-Giguére
  6. M. Vogelsberger
  7. D. Sijacki
  8. R. Hickox

Citations in the corpus