Amazon's Mechanical Turk
By Michael D. Buhrmester, T. Kwang, Samuel D. Gosling. 2011
2,636 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Haemoon Oh
- Martin J. Burnham
- Yen K. Le
- Elise Tak
- Kevin Kam Fung So
- Karthik Narasimhan
- Kevin Crowston
- Regina Barzilay
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Haemoon Oh
- Martin J. Burnham
- Yen K. Le
- Elise Tak
- Kevin Kam Fung So
- Karthik Narasimhan
- Kevin Crowston
- Regina Barzilay
Citations in the corpus
- Who is Mturk? Personal characteristics and sample consistency of these online workers (2018, positive): “In comparison to internet samples, MTurk samples were found to be similar in race (Berinsky et al., 2012) and gender (Buhrmester et al., 2011).”
- Good Housekeeping, Great Expectations: Gender and Housework Norms (2019, neutral): “Nevertheless, it should be noted that the participants on the platform are slightly more educated and more technologically experienced than the average American (Berinsky, Huber, and Lenz 2012; Buhrmester, Kwang, and Gosling 2011).”
- The influence of political ideology on trust in science (2013, positive): “…way for recruiting a large number of respondents for online experiments from a reasonably wide cross-section of the general public—considerably more diverse than the traditional recruitment pool of university undergraduates (Berinsky et al 2012, Buhrmester et al 2011, Paolacci et al 2010).”
- Do Teacher Status, Gender, and Years of Teaching Experience Impact Job Satisfaction and Work Engagement? (2020, neutral): “MTurk is a popular crowdsourcing service used by social science researchers to recruit participants (Buhrmester et al., 2011), and a number of studies suggested that the quality of data collected through crowdsourcing was as good or better than the quality of data collected using more traditional…”
- Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments (2017, positive): “1 The psychometric properties of multiple well-established personality scales have even been quantitatively replicated (Buhrmester et al., 2011; Peer et al., 2013; Rouse, 2015).”