Technology Innovation and Climate Change Policy: an overview of issues and options

By Michael Grubb. 2004

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7347f49d2b08ae6bf17a4a0bac3c7d1df2b3ee71

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The multiple roles of state investment banks in low-carbon energy finance: An analysis of Australia, the UK and Germany (2018, background): “Although finance plays an important role along the entire innovation chain, it is especially downstream finance for commercialisation that is important for the rapid deployment of low-carbon technologies (Bürer and Wüstenhagen, 2009; Grubb, 2004; Karltorp, 2015; Mazzucato and Semieniuk, 2017).”
Investing in low-carbon transitions: energy finance as an adaptive market (2017, methodology): “To frame this analysis, the authors draw on the ‘three domains of planetary economics’ proposed by Grubb, Hourcade, and Neuhoff (2014), co-evolutionary change approaches (Foxon, 2011), and theories of ‘adaptive’ finance (Lo, 2004, 2012; Soufian, Forbes, & Hudson, 2014).”
Theorising Transitional Pathways in Response to Climate Change: Technocentrism, Ecocentrism, and the Carbon Economy (2009, background): “As Grubb (2004) noted, identified technologies hold much promise in providing a rich portfolio of options matched to the major sectors of energy production, conversion, and use.”
Green growth versus economic growth: Do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice? (2021, background): “However, previously Grubb (2004) drew our attention to the fact that there is no “silver bullet” that mitigates climate change.”
The political logics of clean energy transitions (2018, background): “36 Grubb (2004); Foxon et al. (2005); Balachandra et al. (2010). energy without considering political drivers and constraints.”
Bottom-up estimation of industrial and public R&D investment by technology in support of policy-making: the case of selected low-carbon energy technologies (2012, background): “It is widely acknowledged that innovation requires interlinking market demand policies with ‘technology push’ instruments, such as direct R&D support (IEA, 2000, 2003; Sagar and Zwaan, 2006; Grubb, 2004; Foxon, 2003).”