Perception and the Fall From Eden

By T. Gendler, J. Hawthorne. 2006

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Why explain visual experience in terms of content (2010, background): “For uninstantiated perfect colors, see Chalmers (2006). grounding intuition in spirit but not in letter.”
The particularity and phenomenology of perceptual experience (2010, background): “In contrast, the notion of phenomenological particularity picks out what is sometimes referred to as the intentional directedness (e.g. Horgan and Tienson 2002) or as the direct presentational phenomenology of an experience (e.g. Chalmers 2006a).”
Color Constancy and the Complexity of Color (2005, background): “For discussion of a related argument in which the variation is due to differences among perceivers see (Byrne and Hilbert 2004) 6 This problem has been discussed in two recent papers (Cohen 2003, 2004; Chalmers 2006).”
ATTENTION AND MENTAL PAINT (2010, background): “…Tyler Burge ( 2003 ) and David Chalmers ( 2004 ) in which modes of presentation are explicitly characterized in phenomenal terms or views such as that of Sydney Shoemaker ( 1994 ; 2001 , 2003 ) and Chalmers ( 2006 ) in which the properties attributed by perception are characterized phenomenally .”