Elk and hunter space-use sharing in South Dakota.

By Joshua J. Millspaugh, Gary C. Brundige, Robert A. Gitzen, K. Raedeke. 2000

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7325d6d1744583352e350fea909d5808902b3e07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Fieberg
2. D. Christianson
3. S. Creel
4. J. Vokoun
5. C. O. Kochanny
6. John M. Marzluff
7. P. J. White
8. L. Mech

Citations in the corpus

• Migration of northern Yellowstone elk: implications of spatial structuring (2010, result): “…display a flexible strategy aimed at reducing hunting risk by varying either the timing of autumn migrations or timing of arrivals onto winter range, similar to findings of other studies near YNP and elsewhere (Burcham et al. 1999; Millspaugh et al. 2000; Proffitt et al. 2009; Vieira et al. 2003).”
• RELATING RESOURCES TO A PROBABILISTIC MEASURE OF SPACE USE: FOREST FRAGMENTS AND STELLER'S JAYS (2004, background): “…or ‘‘core’’ use (Samuel et al. 1985), to incorporate geographically referenced time budgets into home range calculations (Samuel and Garton 1987), and to assess animal interactions (Seidel 1992, Millspaugh et al. 2000), it has not been used to relate relative space use to resource attributes.”
• Kernel Density Estimates of Linear Home Ranges for Stream Fishes: Advantages and Data Requirements (2003, methodology): “Patterns of space use among individual neighboring animals have also been investigated: the volume of intersection index (Seidel 1992) was used to describe the changes in space use among Rocky Mountain elk Cervus canadensis during hunting seasons by creating a kernel density estimate of hunter space”
• Comparability of three analytical techniques to assess joint space use (2004, methodology): “Measures of joint space use are used in studies of sexual segregation (Mace and Waller 1997, Gross 1998), wildlife and human interactions (Millspaugh et al. 2000), mother–offspring associations (Bull and Baghurst 1998), site fidelity (VanDeelen et al. 1998), territoriality (Oldenburg et al. 1985),…”
• QUANTIFYING HOME-RANGE OVERLAP: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE UTILIZATION DISTRIBUTION (2005, methodology): “…rank pairs of UDs in terms of their overlap supports their recent application as meaningful response variables for correlation/regression analysis (Millspaugh et al. 2000, Roloff et al. 2001), as measures of site fidelity that can be compared across various time periods (Marzluff et al. 2001),…”
• A Review of Environmental Factors Affecting Elk Winter Diets (2007, background): “…hunting) causes significant behavioral and physiological responses by elk, including movement, displacement (Edge and Marcum 1985, Conner et al. 2001), changes in group size, habitat shifts (Coop 1973, Beall 1974, Millspaugh et al. 2000), and glucocorticoid stress responses (Creel et al. 2002).”
• Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications (2010, methodology): “2000), the hunting method employed (Root et al. 1988; Millspaugh et al. 2000; Vieira et al. 2003) and the level of hunting pressure (Johnson et al.”