Condorcet's paradox and the likelihood of its occurrence: different perspectives on balanced preferences*

By William V. Gehrlein. 2002

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72dee84d3c1b80c7523f4804f227989d6d626d29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Davide P. Cervone
2. William S. Zwicker

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Davide P. Cervone
2. William S. Zwicker
3. William V. Gehrlein

In Statistics and Probability

1. Davide P. Cervone
2. William S. Zwicker

Citations in the corpus

• Which Scoring Rule Maximizes Condorcet Efficiency Under Iac? (2005, methodology): “If we divide each of the vote counts, ni, that appears in our vote profile P = (n1, n2, n3, n4, n5, n6) by the number of votes, n, we obtain a normalized profile P̄ = (x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) of numbers xi = ni/n that represent the fractions of voters who favor each of the six strict preference…”