International comparison of CO2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry
By Yeonbae Kim, Ernst Worrell. 2002
225 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/729eae5ebeec88b103c3fda311c606d4feeed188
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Environmental Engineering
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Potential impacts of industrial structure on energy consumption and CO2 emission: a case study of Beijing (2015, background): “Moreover, researchers usually take industrial structural effect into consideration, when identifying the factors which influence the level of energy consumption and CO2 emission (Kim and Worrell, 2002; Liaskas et al., 2000).”
- Preliminary assessment of a method utilizing carbon dioxide and steelmaking slags to produce precipitated calcium carbonate (2012, background): “Steel manufacturing which is one of the biggest industrial sources of CO2 emissions [5] could benefit from this option by utilizing its own by-products, steelmaking slags for sequestering CO2.”
- Effective CO2-specific sequestration capacity of steel slags and variability in their leaching behaviour in view of industrial mineral carbonation (2010, background): “Worldwide the iron and steel industry accounts for 6–7% of the total CO2 emissions (Kim and Worrell, 2002; House and van der Walle, 2007) whilst it generates about 350-million tons of iron and steel slag per annum (Miklos, 2000).”
- Prospective scenarios on energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the European Iron & Steel industry (2013, background): “Another way to produce crude steel is by directly reducing iron ore (DRI) in a shaft furnace producing sponge iron [27].”
- Decomposition analysis of energy-related carbon emissions from UK manufacturing (2012, unknown): “Physical output is generally accepted as the best measure of useful output from a site or subsector of manufacturing [16, 27-29, 31-37] being objective [23] and not subject to the price fluctuations of economic measures of output.”