A scalable active framework for region annotation in 3D shape collections
By Li Yi, Vladimir G. Kim, Duygu Ceylan, I-Chao Shen, Mengyan Yan, Hao Su, Cewu Lu, Qi-Xing Huang, Alla Sheffer, Leonidas J. Guibas. 2016
1,414 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Leonidas J. Guibas
- Charles Ruizhongtai Qi
- Matthias Nießner
- Binh-Son Hua
- Sai-Kit Yeung
- Andreas Geiger
- Or Litany
- Andrea Tagliasacchi
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Xiaogang Wang
- Jitendra Malik
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Trevor Darrell
- Yi Yang
In Geology
- Leonidas J. Guibas
- Charles Ruizhongtai Qi
- Binh-Son Hua
- Sai-Kit Yeung
- Or Litany
- Jiwen Lu
- Matthias Nießner
- Jie Zhou
Citations in the corpus
- PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation (2016, methodology): “We evaluate on ShapeNet part data set from [26], which contains 16,881 shapes from 16 categories, annotated with 50 parts in total.”
- PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Space (2017, methodology): “Following the setting in [32], we evaluate our approach on part segmentation task assuming category label for each shape is already known.”
- SyncSpecCNN: Synchronized Spectral CNN for 3D Shape Segmentation (2016, methodology): “We compare our framework with traditional learning-based techniques [27, 29] leveraging on local geometric features and shape alignment cues, as well as recent deep learning based approaches [2] which also fall into the family of graph CNNs.”
- PointCNN: Convolution On X-Transformed Points (2018, methodology): “We show detailed segmentation result comparisons on ShapeNet Parts in Table 1, we can see our approach achieves the best overall performance and are best on 7 of the 16 categories.”
- Local Spectral Graph Convolution for Point Set Feature Learning (2018, methodology): “We use the official training/testing split, following [11,20,21], where the challenge is to assign a part label to each point in the test set.”
- Vector Neurons: A General Framework for SO(3)-Equivariant Networks (2021, methodology): “For the ShapeNet dataset, we followed [38] by using ShapeNet-part for part segmentation, which has 16 shape categories with more than 30,000 models.”
- Neighbors Do Help: Deeply Exploiting Local Structures of Point Clouds (2017, methodology): “We evaluate our work for part segmentation on ShapeNet part dataset [33].”
- PAConv: Position Adaptive Convolution with Dynamic Kernel Assembling on Point Clouds (2021, methodology): “PAConv is also evaluated on ShapeNet Parts [61] for shape part segmentation.”
- SO-Net: Self-Organizing Network for Point Cloud Analysis (2018, methodology): “Object part segmentation is demonstrated with the ShapeNetPart dataset [38].”
- 3D Shape Segmentation with Projective Convolutional Networks (2016, methodology): “The dataset from ShapeNetCore currently contains 17,773 expert-verified segmentations of 3D models across 16 categories.”
- Multiresolution Tree Networks for 3D Point Cloud Processing (2018, methodology): “Previous work has also studied extensions of ConvNets to mesh surfaces such as spectral CNNs [5,45], geodesic CNNs [29], or anisotropic CNNs [2].”
- GSPN: Generative Shape Proposal Network for 3D Instance Segmentation in Point Cloud (2018, methodology): “Different from previous large-scale part annotation dataset [46], PartNet provides ground truth part instance annotation in addition to semantic labeling and the segmentation granularity is more detailed, making it more suitable for testing instance segmentation approaches.”
- Recurrent Slice Networks for 3D Segmentation of Point Clouds (2018, methodology): “Another one is the ShapeNet dataset [35], a synthetic dataset.”
- Escape from Cells: Deep Kd-Networks for the Recognition of 3D Point Cloud Models (2017, methodology): “Our results are compared to 3D-CNN (reproduced from [20]), PointNet architecture [20], and the architecture of [37].”
- LPD-Net: 3D Point Cloud Learning for Large-Scale Place Recognition and Environment Analysis (2018, background): “ModelNet [26] and ShapeNet [27]), but this is not the case for large-scale environments, since such point clouds are mainly composed of different objects in the scene and with unknown relationships between the objects.”
- Point-M2AE: Multi-scale Masked Autoencoders for Hierarchical Point Cloud Pre-training (2022, methodology): “We evaluate Point-M2AE for part segmentation on ShapeNetPart [48], which predicts per-point part labels and requires detailed understanding for local patterns.”
- StarMap for Category-Agnostic Keypoint and Viewpoint Estimation (2018, methodology): “Also, annotating 3D keypoints of a CAD model [47] is not a hard task, given an interactive 3D UI such as MeshLab [5].”