Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
By Bernard Walter Silverman. 1987
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sergey Levine
- Dacheng Tao
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Trevor Darrell
- Yi Yang
- Luc Van Gool
Citations in the corpus
- Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyonds (2016, methodology): “A nonparametric representation of tree-structured graphical models was introduced in Song et al. (2010b). Inference in this kind of graphical model relies mostly on message passing algorithms.”
- Filtering with State-Observation Examples via Kernel Monte Carlo Filter (2013, methodology): “ighbors approach (Stone, 1977) for learning the observation model. A problem here is that conditional density estimation suffers from the curse of dimensionality if observations are high-dimensional (Silverman, 1986). Vlassis et al. (2002) avoided this problem by estimating the conditional density f”
- Comprehensible credit scoring models using rule extraction from support vector machines (2007, positive): “For a discrete valued input, Trepan simply uses the empirical frequencies of the various values whereas for a continuous input x, a kernel density estimation method is used to model the probability distribution f(x) as follows [27]:”
- Estimating mutual information. (2003, background): “This is recommended in the literature [31], since both statistical and systematic errors would become too large for smaller values of h .”
- Closing the learning-planning loop with predictive state representations (2009, methodology): “Although use of kernel density estimation for continuous observations in PSRs is not new [29], extending our algorithm to use KDE results, for the first time, in a statistically consistent learning algorithm for PSRs with continuous observations.”
- Robust kernel density estimation (2008, background): “Introduction The kernel density estimator (KDE) is a well-known nonparametric estimator of univariate or multivariate densities, and numerous articles have been written on its properties, applications, and extensions (Silverman, 1986; Scott, 1992).”
- Noise Estimation Using Density Estimation for Self-Supervised Multimodal Learning (2020, methodology): “Existing density estimation algorithms can be divided into two categories: (a) parametric or semi-parametric approaches such as Gaussian Mixture models (McLachlan and Krishnan 2007; Wang and Wang 2015) and probabilistic graphical models (Koller and Friedman 2009); and (b) non-parametric approaches s”
- Open-Ended Learning Leads to Generally Capable Agents (2021, methodology): “We use a Gaussian kernel and Silverman’s rule to estimate its bandwidth (Silverman, 2018).”
- Regional disparities in the European Union: Convergence and Agglomeration (2008, background): “window sliding across the income distribution (see e.g. Silverman 1986, Fox 1990, Scott 1979”
- Decentralization and efficiency of local government (2010, methodology): “However, we may turn to kernel smoothing methods ( Silverman 1986 ) to estimate f , and therefore ˆ f would be the nonparametric kernel estimator of f . In such a case, since ˆ f = (1/(Sh)) S=1 K ((xs − x)/ h), a suitable”
- A SINGLE-INDEX QUANTILE REGRESSION MODEL AND ITS ESTIMATION (2012, background): “See Silverman (1986), Fan and Gijbels (1996), and Cheng (1997) for more details.”
- Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Sample Selection Models (2001, methodology): “The smoothing was done using a standard normal kernel and the rule of thumb bandwidth suggested by Silverman (1986) for density estimation.”
- Linearly Combining Density Estimators via Stacking (1999, methodology): “This is all consistent with the standard theory of kernel density estimation; as the sample size increases, for a given true density the optimal single bandwidth decreases as an inverse function of N ( Silverman, 1986 ).”
- Nonparametric Density Estimation: Toward Computational Tractability (2003, methodology): “For good estimates, the exact form of turns out to be relatively unimportant, while the correct choice of is critical [ 22 , 20].”
- Unified Cross-Validation Methodology For Selection Among Estimators and a General Cross-Validated Adaptive Epsilon-Net Estimator: Finite Sample Oracle Inequalities and Examples (2003, unknown): “Silverman (1986) refers to Scott and Factor (1981) to indicate that for densities with infinite support this leave-one-out likelihood cross-validation method for bandwidth selection in density estimation is sensitive to outliers, and to Schuster and Gregory (1981) to point out that leave-one-out…”