Theorising Transition: The Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformations

By R. Lau. 2001

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Global Economic Crisis, Eastern Europe, and the Former Soviet Union: Models of Development and the Contradictions of Internationalization (2010, background): “…of ECE were opened up, and as there was an increased reliance on 2I.e., a crisis of capitalism rather than a “transitional depression” resulting from the adoption of policies attempting to shift from a planned to a market economy (see Pickles and Smith, 1998). external financing across the region.”
Theorising Transitional Pathways in Response to Climate Change: Technocentrism, Ecocentrism, and the Carbon Economy (2009, background): “…termed a theory (Rotmans et al, 2002), it is better understood as a quasitheory that articulates concepts and insights about the nature of transitional processes, but which lacks the internal consistency or predictive capacity to be a coherent theory (Burawoy, 1985; Pickles and Smith, 1998).”
Geographies of Neoliberalism in Latin America (2005, background): “Such a narrative of transition tends to construct a historicized binary opposition between ISI and neoliberalism, closing down the process of transition as a terrain of inquiry (Smith and Pickles, 1998).”
Gentrification in central moscow ‐ a market process or a deliberate policy? money, power and people in housing regeneration in ostozhenka (2005, background): “The very process of transition to the market may be regarded as a neoliberal politico-economic project (Pickles and Smith, 1998).”