The Home Court Advantage in International Corporate Litigation

By Utpal Bhattacharya, Neal Galpin, Bruce D. Haslem. Journal law and economy, 2007

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/729a264fb6d1e75af83d09de7da445027e45ae50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Yrjö Koskinen
2. Chenying Zhang
3. Mariassunta Giannetti
4. Haitian Lu
5. Hongbo Pan

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Yrjö Koskinen
2. Chenying Zhang
3. Mariassunta Giannetti

In Strategy and Management

1. Yrjö Koskinen
2. Chenying Zhang
3. Mariassunta Giannetti

Citations in the corpus

• The liability of foreignness in capital markets: Sources and remedies (2011, unknown): “In addition, foreign firms are subject to a greater frequency of lawsuits than local firms (Bhattacharya, Galpin, & Haslem, 2007).”
• Political Connectedness and Court Outcomes: Evidence from Chinese Corporate Lawsuits (2015, background): “Bhattacharya, Galpin, and Haslem (2007) find empirical support for the home-court-advantage hypothesis in a sample of US and foreign defendants being sued in US federal courts.”
• Investor Protection, Equity Returns, and Financial Globalization (2009, background): “The biases of domestic judges and politicians favoring domestic stakeholders may also induce segmentation in the market for control (Bhattacharya, Galpin, and Haslem (2007)).”