Ecosystem function enhanced by combining four functional types of plant species in intensively managed grassland mixtures: a 3‐year continental‐scale field experiment

By John A. Finn, L. Kirwan, John Connolly, M. Sebastiá, Á. Helgadóttir, O. Baadshaug, G. Bélanger, A. Black, C. Brophy, Rosemary P. Collins and 22 more. 2013

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

1.A coordinated continental-scale field experiment across 31 sites was used to compare the biomass yield of monocultures and four species mixtures associated with intensively managed agricultural grassland systems. To increase complementarity in resource use, each of the four species in the experimental design represented a distinct functional type derived from two levels of each of two functional traits, nitrogen acquisition (N2-fixing legume or nonfixing grass) crossed with temporal development (fast-establishing or temporally persistent). Relative abundances of the four functional types in mixtures were systematically varied at sowing to vary the evenness of the same four species in mixture communities at each site and sown at two levels of seed density. 2.Across multiple years, the total yield (including weed biomass) of the mixtures exceeded that of the average monoculture in >97% of comparisons. It also exceeded that of the best monoculture (transgressive overyielding) in about 60% of sites, with a mean yield ratio of mixture to best-performing monoculture of 1·07 across all sites. Analyses based on yield of sown species only (excluding weed biomass) demonstrated considerably greater transgressive overyielding (significant at about 70% of sites, ratio of mixture to best-performing monoculture = 1·18). 3.Mixtures maintained a resistance to weed invasion over at least 3 years. In mixtures, median values indicate

Subfields: Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7297c8e7d4b7f63683f73b6b776d91b4dd63dc74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Forestry

  1. David Tilman
  2. Jean-François Soussana

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. F. Isbell
  2. Jane Cowles
  3. Nina Buchmann
  4. Jean-François Soussana
  5. L. Kirwan
  6. K. Dehnen‐Schmutz
  7. John Connolly
  8. J. Bennett

In Soil Science

  1. F. Isbell
  2. David Tilman
  3. Jean-François Soussana

Citations in the corpus