Perspectives – Minimizing Observer Bias in Behavioral Studies: A Review and Recommendations
By Gordon M. Burghardt, Julia N. Bartmess-Levasseur, Sheri A. Browning, Kathleen E. Morrison, Courtney L. Stec, Christopher E. Zachau, T. Freeberg. 2012
146 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Small Animals, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7294bceb442d7eb871986b532859f05430760d49
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Small Animals
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Observer bias in animal behaviour research: can we believe what we score, if we score what we believe? (2014, background): “Burghardt et al. (2012) reviewed several hundred articles published in five leading animal behaviour journals during the last five decades.”
- The world from a dog's point of view (2013, unknown): “interjudge agreement), the ages of the dogs, the times of day when the tests are performed, and so on (see Burghardt et al., 2012; Caro, Roper, Young, & Dank, 1979; Kaufman & Rosenthal, 2009). An important first step has been made in this regard by Gácsi, Kara, et al. (2009) who found evidence that ”
- Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2021, background): “responses of animals to observer presence (4, 5).”