Finite element shakedown analysis of two‐dimensional structures

By Giovanni Garcea, Giampaolo Armentano, Salvatore Petrolo, R. Casciaro. 2005

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/727a21786ebea8ff98031820e2b11c9ad9fc7c55

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Hung Nguyen-Xuan
2. Trung Nguyen-Thoi
3. N. Nguyen‐Thanh
4. Timon Rabczuk
5. L. Leonetti
6. Trung Nghia Tran
7. T. N. Tran
8. Manfred Staat

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Hung Nguyen-Xuan
2. Trung Nguyen-Thoi
3. Timon Rabczuk
4. Jaan-Willem Simon
5. D. Weichert
6. L. Leonetti
7. T. N. Tran
8. Manfred Staat

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Hung Nguyen-Xuan
2. Trung Nguyen-Thoi
3. N. Nguyen‐Thanh
4. Timon Rabczuk
5. Guirong Liu
6. Trung Nghia Tran
7. Stéphane P.A. Bordas
8. T. N. Tran

Citations in the corpus

• Computation of limit and shakedown loads using a node‐based smoothed finite element method (2012, methodology): “The load domains were chosen analogously as in [67]: 1.”
• Numerical lower bound shakedown analysis of engineering structures (2011, background): “[47–55], where comparative studies have been presented in e.”
• An edge‐based smoothed finite element method for primal–dual shakedown analysis of structures (2010, methodology): “For the purpose of comparison, the load domain, geometrical data and material properties are chosen analogously as in [9], i.”
• A unified mathematical programming formulation of strain driven and interior point algorithms for shakedown and limit analysis (2011, methodology): “Each QP problem is, in this work, efficiently solved with the Goldfarb–Idnani dual active set method [35] already used in [6].”