A Comparison Study of Multiple Measures of Adherence to HIV Protease Inhibitors

By Honghu Liu, C. Golin, L. Miller, R. Hays, C. Beck, Sam Sanandaji, J. Christian, Tomás Maldonado, Dena Duran, A. Kaplan and 1 more. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2001

827 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Emergency Medicine, Infectious Diseases

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7278ac427b74bac48e5458c0cdaa60c7ac681a3f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Jane M. Simoni
2. C. Pearson
3. M. Lam
4. Wai-yin Lam
5. D. Hardy
6. A. Kurth
7. Pamela A. Frick
8. P. Fresco

Citations in the corpus

• Self-Report Measures of Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence: A Review with Recommendations for HIV Research and Clinical Management (2006, methodology): “, 2005) and that adherence may be underestimated by EDM and overestimated by self-report and pill count, thus warranting the use of several adherence measures (Liu et al., 2001).”
• Medication Adherence Measures: An Overview (2015, methodology): “showed that the composite use of MEMS, pill count, and clinician’s interview held the strongest predictive power compared to the power when each measure was used separately [53].”
• Medication adherence in HIV-infected adults: effect of patient age, cognitive status, and substance abuse (2004, background): “It is well accepted that self-report techniques, particularly when used to assess ‘socially undesirable’ behaviors such as failing to adhere to physicians’ instructions, lack precision, and frequently underestimate the behavior in question [13,34].”