Using fast weights to deblur old memories
By Geoffrey E. Hinton. 1987
Subfields: Model Architectures
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Model Architectures
- Yoshua Bengio
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Quoc V. Le
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Geoffrey E. Hinton
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Yann LeCun
- Oriol Vinyals
Citations in the corpus
- Learning to Learn with Generative Models of Neural Network Checkpoints (2022, methodology): “Rather than parameterizing update rules, neural networks can be used to directly output or modify other neural networks’ parameters (Schmidhuber, 1992; 1993; Hinton & Plaut, 1987).”
- On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithms (2018, background): “It is also related to the older idea of fast weights / slow weights [7].”
- Meta-Learning with Latent Embedding Optimization (2018, background): “The problem of few-shot adaptation has been approached in the context of fast weights (Hinton & Plaut, 1987; Ba et al., 2016), learning-to-learn (Schmidhuber, 1987; Thrun & Pratt, 1998; Hochre-iter et al., 2001; Andrychowicz et al., 2016), and through meta-learning .”
- Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Review (2018, background): “tational framework that effectively generalizes across experiences while retaining specific memories in a lifelong manner (see Sec. 2.3). An early computational example of this concept was proposed by Hinton and Plaut (1987) in which each synaptic connection has two weights: a plastic weight with slo”
- Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replay (2017, background): “Several works illustrate empirical consequences in sequential learning settings [7, 29], and provide a few primitive solutions [16, 30] such as replaying all previous data.”
- Meta Networks (2017, background): “Hinton & Plaut (1987) suggested the usage of fast weights for rapid learning.”
- Using Fast Weights to Attend to the Recent Past (2016, background): “ically adjusted by the input or hidden activities via the gates. However, LSTMs are still limited to a short-term memory capacity of O(H) for the history of the current sequence. Several researchers [Hinton and Plaut, 1987, Schmidhuber, 1992] have suggested that neural networks could benefit from a t”
- Learning Rapid-Temporal Adaptations (2017, background): “The MetaNet udpates synaptic connections (weights) between neurons using fast weights [34, 12] to implement the rapid adaptation.”
- Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Neural Networks (2017, background): “Since then, there have been multiple attempts to mitigate this phenomenon (Hinton and Plaut 1987; Robins 1995; Goodrich and Arel 2014; Draelos et al. 2016; Ren et al. 2017; Fernando et al. 2017; Kirkpatrick et al. 2017).”
- Born to Learn: the Inspiration, Progress, and Future of Evolved Plastic Artificial Neural Networks (2017, background): “, 1982) and various constraints (Miller and Mackay, 1994), or more advanced update dynamics such as dual weights for fast and slow decay (Levy and Bairaktaris, 1995; Hinton and Plaut, 1987; Bullinaria, 2009a; Soltoggio, 2015).”
- Short-term plasticity as cause–effect hypothesis testing in distal reward learning (2014, background): “Such as distinction is not new in connectionist models (Hinton and Plaut, 1987; Schmidhuber, 1992; Levy and Bairaktaris, 1995; Tieleman and Hinton, 2009; Bullinaria, 2009), however, in the proposed study the idea is extended to model hypothesis testing and memory consolidation with distal rewards.”
- Memory Efficient Experience Replay for Streaming Learning (2018, background): “Regularization constrains weight updates so they do not interfere with previous learning [35], [42], [48],”
- Few-Shot and Continual Learning with Attentive Independent Mechanisms (2021, methodology): “Earlier works are based on regularization method, with [17] proposing the use of fast and slow training weights, borrowing the idea of plasticity and stability for network training.”
- Replay in Deep Learning: Current Approaches and Missing Biological Elements (2021, neutral): “Another alternative to CLS theory is the idea of using both fast and slow weights between units for each connection in the network (Hinton & Plaut, 1987).”
- MgSvF: Multi-Grained Slow versus Fast Framework for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (2020, background): “As for the slow and fast weights learning, FWDOM [78] assumes that each connection of a network has two weights (a plastic weight and elastic weight), and focuses on the effect of slow and fast changing of these weights in learning one network.”
- Lookahead Optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step back (2019, methodology): “Lookahead first updates the “fast weights” [12] k times using any standard optimizer in its inner loop before updating the “slow weights” once in the direction of the final fast weights.”