The Unreasonable Fairness of Maximum Nash Welfare
By Ioannis Caragiannis, David Kurokawa, Hervé Moulin, Ariel D. Procaccia, Nisarg Shah, Junxing Wang. ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2016
697 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7251c2251a4316086d9a6c690570d5c7187a7b1a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Nisarg Shah
- Kamesh Munagala
- Brandon Fain
- Tim Roughgarden
- Vincent Conitzer
- Benjamin Plaut
- Min Kyung Lee
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Nisarg Shah
- Kamesh Munagala
- Brandon Fain
- Tim Roughgarden
- Vincent Conitzer
- Benjamin Plaut
- Min Kyung Lee
- É. Tardos
Citations in the corpus
- Algorithmic Mediation in Group Decisions: Fairness Perceptions of Algorithmically Mediated vs. Discussion-Based Social Division (2017, background): “Spliddit’s goods feature aims to fairly divide any kind of goods among two or more individuals [8, 27, 40].”
- Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuations (2017, background): “For example, in the case of distribution of indivisible goods on Spliddit, users know that the solution will be envy-free up to one good and Pareto optimal [Caragiannis et al., 2016].”
- Fair Public Decision Making (2016, background): “[14] already show that MNW satises PO.”
- Fair Allocation of Indivisible Public Goods (2018, background): “[2017] introduced the novel relaxation of proportionality up to one issue in their public decision making framework, inspired by a similar relaxation called envy-freeness up to one good in the private goods seing [Caragiannis et al., 2016, Lipton et al., 2004]. ey say that an outcome c of a public”