Noninvasive population genetics: a review of sample source, diet, fragment length and microsatellite motif effects on amplification success and genotyping error rates

By T. Broquet, N. Ménard, E. Petit. Conservation Genetics, 2006

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Noninvasive sampling and genetic variability, pack structure, and dynamics in an expanding wolf population (2014, unknown): “Although low-quality DNA samples may generate genotyping errors (Broquet et al. 2007), these can be minimized by using well-tested laboratory protocols and quality controls (BejaPereira et al.”
Ageing and environmental factors affect PCR success in wolf (Canis lupus) excremental DNA samples (2007, background): “© 2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Ageing is perhaps the worst among the several factors which worsen the quality of excremental DNA (Deagle et al. 2006; Broquet et al. 2007).”
Advances in molecular technology and their impact on fisheries genetics (2008, background): “More importantly, microsatellites suffer from a high potential for null alleles (non-amplifying alleles) and genotyping error arising from their size-based nature (Bonin et al. 2004; Pompanon et al. 2005; DeWoody et al. 2006; Broquet et al. 2007).”
Population monitoring of snow leopards using noninvasive collection of scat samples: a pilot study (2008, background): “…and quality of target DNA and PCR inhibitors (Taberlet et al., 1999) contribute to genotyping errors, the location of microsatellites within repetitive elements (i.e. SINEs, LINEs and LTR retrotransposons) may explain genotyping errors in specific loci (Broquet et al., 2007; Valiere et al., 2007).”