Molecular targeting of retinoic acid metabolism in neuroblastoma: the role of the CYP26 inhibitor R116010 in vitro and in vivo
By J. Armstrong, G. A. Taylor, Huw D. Thomas, A. Boddy, C. P. Redfern, G. Veal. British Journal of Cancer, 2007
1,255 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Isomerisation to all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) is widely accepted as the key mechanism underlying the favourable clinical properties of 13-cis-retinoic acid (13cisRA). As intracellular metabolism of ATRA by CYP26 may result in clinical resistance to 13cisRA, an increase in efficacy may be achieved through modulation of this metabolic pathway. We have evaluated the effect of the CYP26 inhibitor R116010 on retinoid metabolism in neuroblastoma cell lines and a xenograft model. In neuroblastoma cells, which showed a high level of CYP26 induction in response to ATRA, R116010 selectively inhibited ATRA metabolism. In addition, siRNA-mediated knockdown of CYP26 selectively increased ATRA levels and the expression of retinoid-responsive marker genes was potentiated by R116010. Treatment of mice bearing SH-SY5Y xenografts with 13cisRA (100 mg kg−1) revealed substantial levels (16%) of intratumoral ATRA after 6 h, despite plasma ATRA levels representing only 1% total retinoids under these conditions. Co-administration of R116010 with 13cisRA in this mouse model resulted in significant increases in plasma ATRA and 13cisRA concentrations. Furthermore, R116010 induced significant decreases in levels of 4-oxo metabolites in hepatic tissue after co-administration with either ATRA or 13cisRA. These data suggest considerable potential for CYP26 inhibitors in the future treatment of neuroblastoma with 13cisRA.
Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Neurology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/723a5a0f4ee9a747009537e4a79a71c26fc8c24a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- Fred H. Gage
- Richard G. M. Morris
- James Bradley Aimone
- Hongjun Song
- Guo-li Ming
- Sebastian Jessberger
In Molecular Biology
- Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin
- Okihide Hikosaka
- Masayuki Matsumoto
- Fred H. Gage
- Gianluca Baldassarre
- Marco Mirolli
- Morten L. Kringelbach
- Richard G. M. Morris
In Neurology
- Fred H. Gage
- Chunmei Zhao
- Gianluca Baldassarre
- Marco Mirolli
- Kevin N. Gurney
- Yangling Mu
- Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin
- Peter Kok
Citations in the corpus
- What is reinforced by phasic dopamine signals? (2008, background): “Such systems are likely to include the amygdala (Paton et al., 2006, Balleine and Killcross, 2006), hippocampus (Lisman and Grace, 2005) and limbic cortex (Corbit and Balleine, 2003; Corbit et al., 2002; Schoenbaum et al., 2003; Schultz, 2000).”
- How Prediction Errors Shape Perception, Attention, and Motivation (2012, background): “For example, the hippocampus induces novelty-dependent dopaminergic responses in the VTA (Lisman and Grace, 2005).”
- Post-learning hippocampal dynamics promote preferential retention of rewarding events (2016, background): “…suggest that dopaminergic input from the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area complex (SN/VTA) to the hippocampus is enhanced during learning of motivationally significant events (Düzel et al., 2009; Kahn and Shohamy, 2013; Lisman and Grace, 2005; Lisman et al., 2011; Shohamy and Adcock, 2010).”
- Ever-changing cycles of musical pleasure: The role of dopamine and anticipation. (2012, background): “Dopamine might further contribute to the update of expectations through its involvement in learning-dependent synaptic plasticity (Lisman & Grace, 2005).”
- The nucleus accumbens as a nexus between values and goals in goal-directed behavior: a review and a new hypothesis (2013, background): “, and Burgess, N. (1996). Geometric determinants of the”
- Intrinsically Motivated Learning in Natural and Artificial Systems (2013, background): “The last contribution of the chapter is by John Lisman (a theoretical neuroscientist) and co-workers, who have carried out fundamental work on the brain circuits and mechanisms underlying the acquisition of novel information (Lisman and Grace 2005).”
- Gain in sensitivity and loss in temporal contrast of STDP by dopaminergic modulation at hippocampal synapses (2009, background): “Under this 3-component rule, the learning rate for specific events that trigger the activation of dopamine inputs will be selectively enhanced; thus, allowing for both reliable and efficient encoding of relevant information into memory engrams (52).”
- Elements of a neurobiological theory of hippocampal function: the role of synaptic plasticity, synaptic tagging and schemas (2006, methodology): “The original framework due to Frey & Morris (1998b) implies that it is necessary, whereas that due to Lisman & Grace (2005) indicates that novelty may drive a more diffuse upregulation of neuromodulatory afferents.”