Tourist familiarity and imagery

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How Country Image Affects Tourists’ Destination Evaluations: A Moderated Mediation Approach (2018, background): “Prentice (2004) added another three types of familiarity: proximate, educational, and selfdescribed familiarity.”
Destination Image: A Meta-Analysis of 2000–2007 Research (2010, methodology): “Prideaux et al. (2004) discuss the practices of the tourism industry to form DIs by using sex and sexuality as powerful human emotions and examines the potential for image confusion when “exotic” and “erotic” are used next to each other in DI promotional efforts.”
The Effect of Online Information Search on Image Development (2009, result): “This is consistent with results of advertising research (Holbrook and Batra 1983) and current trend of experience-based marketing (Prentice 2004).”
Structuring Destination Image: A Qualitative Approach (2005, background): “It was also evident that these maps had fewer features, indicating that familiarity has a role to play, if not in creating more positive images, as argued by Prentice (2004), Baloglu (2001), and Beerli and Martin (2004), then in permitting more complex imaging.”