Inefficiencies and Market Power in Financial Arbitrage: A Study of California’s Electricity Markets
By S. Borenstein, James Bushnell, Catherine D. Wolfram. 2006
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72211554e832284efe1b9ba854b4d791695942b0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Erling Pettersen
- Angelica Gianfreda
- D. W. Bunn
- Andy Philpott
- Aaron Smith
- Konstantinos Metaxoglou
- Rafal Weron
- James W. Taylor
Citations in the corpus
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of VARMA Models Using a State‐Space EM Algorithm (2007, background): “In the crisis period after May 2000, Borenstein et al. (2004) argue that Pacific Gas and Electric, the largest utility operating in NP15, may have exercised monopsony power to affect prices to its advantage.”
- Pricing and Firm Conduct in California's Deregulated Electricity Market (2007, unknown): “All of 27 See Klemperer ( 2002 ) and Fabra ( 2003 ) . the units for which I have generation data burn natural gas as their primary fuel .”
- Integration and shock transmissions across European electricity forward markets (2010, background): “1)) suggests that all interconnected markets influence each other in base and in peak periods, the only exception being France which, surprisingly in view of our propositions (2) and (5), does not exercise any impact on UK peak spot prices.”
- Optimizing demand-side bids in day-ahead electricity markets (2006, background): “In [8] an argument is advanced under an assumption of risk neutrality that the day-ahead price will equal the expected real-time price even in the presence of market power.”