Foraging-habitat selection by bats at an urban–rural interface: comparison between a successful and a less successful species

By Joseph E. Duchamp, D. Sparks, J. Whitaker. 2004

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71ff87495939fc1b5750ee66908f4436b8135405

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. Joshua B. Johnson
2. W. Ford
3. Robert Swihart
4. J. Gates
5. Joseph E. Duchamp

In Ecology

1. W. Ford
2. Joshua B. Johnson
3. Robert Swihart
4. J. Gates
5. Joseph E. Duchamp
6. J. Andrew Royle

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Joshua B. Johnson
2. W. Ford
3. J. Gates
4. Robert Swihart
5. Joseph E. Duchamp

Citations in the corpus

• Distribution and activity of bats at local and landscape scales within a rural–urban gradient (2008, background): “regardless of urban or rural setting due to its preference for foraging in open, uncluttered habitats (Geggie and Fenton 1985; Barclay 1986; Duchamp et al. 2004; Ford et al. 2005).”
• Shifts in bat community structure related to evolved traits and features of human-altered landscapes (2008, background): “Within our bat community, Eptesicus fuscus and Lasiurus borealis commonly roost in urban areas and forage at street lamps (Geggie and Fenton 1985; Hickey et al. 1996; Everette et al. 2001; Mager and Nelson 2001; Duchamp et al. 2004).”