The skull of the Early Triassic archosauromorph reptile Prolacerta broomi and its phylogenetic significance

By S. Modesto, H. Sues. 2004

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades (2011, background): “Palatal teeth on the palatal process are retained by the non-archosaurian archosauromorphs Prolacerta, Proterosuchus, proterochampsians, Doswellia, and Euparkeria, and the crown-group archosaurs Turfanosuchus (Wu and Russell, 2001) and Eoraptor (Rauhut, 2003).”
Osteohistology of the Triassic Archosauromorphs Prolacerta, Proterosuchus, Euparkeria, and Erythrosuchus from the Karoo Basin of South Africa (2011, background): “…Prolacerta, Proterosuchus, and Euparkeria have been described in detail (e.g., Broom, 1903, 1913; Ewer, 1965; Gow, 1975; Welman, 1998; Gower, 2003; Modesto and Sues, 2004) and although the postcranial skeleton of Erythrosuchus has yet to be adequately described (due to fragmentary material), the…”
Postcranial Osteology of Azendohsaurus madagaskarensis (?Middle to Upper Triassic, Isalo Group, Madagascar) and its Systematic Position Among Stem Archosaur Reptiles (2015, methodology): “Although our analysis identified Prolacerta broomi as the proximal outgroup of Archosauriformes, as did those of Dilkes (1998), followed by Modesto and Sues (2004), Gottmann-Quesada and Sanders (2009), and Pritchard et al. (2015), we note that this phylogenetic arrangement is poorly supported,…”