On gas–liquid two-phase flow regimes in microchannels

By M. Akbar, D. Plummer, S. Mostafa Ghiaasiaan. 2003

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71bef73ce76ce54dbe26d14b96d0d535e96282ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. T. Karayiannis
2. L. Rossetto
3. Y. Tian
4. L. Doretti
5. L. Chen
6. Suresh V. Garimella
7. M. Mahmoud
8. T. Harirchian

In Mechanical Engineering

1. M. Matkovič
2. Alberto Cavallini
3. T. Karayiannis
4. L. Doretti
5. L. Rossetto
6. Y. Tian
7. L. Chen
8. M. M. Shah

Citations in the corpus

• The effect of tube diameter on vertical two-phase flow regimes in small tubes (2006, background): “[4] divided the entire flow map for small tubes into four regions: (1) Surface tension-dominated region, which included bubbly, plug and slug (2) Inertia-dominated zone 1, which included annular and wavy-annular regimes (3) Inertia-dominated zone 2, for the dispersed flow regime (4) Transition zone.”
• Update on Condensation Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop inside Minichannels (2006, methodology): “[14] try to apply methodologies developed for flow in microgravity to flow in minichannels, as in both system types, the surface tension, inertia, and viscosity are important, while buoyancy is suppressed.”