The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

By G. Norman, R. Faria, F. Paton, A. Llewellyn, Dave Fox, S. Palmer, I. Clifton, J. Paton, N. Woolacott, C. McKenna. 2013

773 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71b7e67438ffe390316096b3a720f26c41767edb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. N. Dias
2. M. Zotti
3. I. Carvalho
4. D. E. Nava
5. P. Montoya

Citations in the corpus

• Fruit fly management research: A systematic review of monitoring and control tactics in the world (2018, methodology): “We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (Moher et al., 2009) (PRISMA statement and Checklist) guidelines in including or excluding publications during screening stages.”
• Association Between Lowering LDL-C and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among Different Therapeutic Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (2016, unknown): “(%) 49 480 (29)c 0 1184 (19) 78 (9) 4416 (24) 5729 (14) 4948 (15) 6227 (21) 3094 (45) 75 156 (24)”